Are Product Launches Peddling For Profits?


Used car salesmanAfter participating in a recent product launch (something I very rarely do), our Platinum Group was discussing the issue and I wanted to share those insights with you.

Considering the recent hysteria behind the massive Apple iPad launch, it got me thinking about how most Internet marketers conduct their product launches.

Most of them work because they’re based on basic human psychology. But I believe people who do use it do it poorly.

In fact, I think they do so because the strategy, particularly as it applies to Internet marketing and digital products specifically, is inherently flawed. What I mean is, in order for it to work — and work well — it must rely on three major factors:

  1. Anticipation
  2. Social proof
  3. Scarcity/urgency

Granted, you can manufacture these. And when you sell Internet, digital, or information products, you have to. Why? Because these products are, or are seen as, limitless.

And therein lies the rub…

The best and most profitable launches in history didn’t rely on any of these. At least, not in a direct way. Sure, these factors do play a huge role in most successful launches. But they occur almost as natural byproducts. They are not manufactured.

And that’s exactly what iPad did for their launch day. They used #1 (anticipation) and #2 (social proof). But they didn’t use #3. In other words, they launched without the need to create or promote any kind of manufactured scarcity.

Why? Because they didn’t need to.

Obviously, iPad is a physical product, which is naturally limited. That scarcity was made even greater on launch day because of #1 and #2. In other words, they didn’t have to “close their doors” and reopen them at some later date to create scarcity.

Granted, Apple may have limited their in-store stocks on launch day to create more demand. I don’t know. And they did a lot more. Seth Godin shares a few others. But I’m referring to the product launch strategy’s three major factors specifically.

My point here is, natural scarcity or creating a genuine sense of urgency — better said, possessing or projecting one — will trump a manufactured one. Every time.

Manufactured scarcity appears self-centered, questionable, and suspicious. When you look at how the FTC, Visa/MasterCard, Google, and now Facebook — with its recent slap — frown upon generated scarcity, you know people are lashing out against the practice.

When Jobs introduced the upcoming iPad, it created a ton of anticipation. With the iPhone being as popular as it was, news generated inherent social proof since people already had experiences with the iPhone.

But there’s more to it than that.

Apple created genuine scarcity because they have strong brand recognition, are well positioned, and have a history of delivering solid products with great value. They didn’t have to poach other people’s lists, create sales contests, or use high-pressure tactics.

Now, I’m not saying joint ventures, sales contests, and manufactured scarcity are wrong. But if you keep using them, product launch after product launch, then chances are you will be be seen as nothing more than a salesman. A slick, smarmy, snake-oil peddler.

(That’s not just my opinion, either.)

Apple didn’t create demand, which is why they didn’t need to manufacture scarcity. Whether the product was a physical one didn’t matter. To paraphrase Gene Schwartz in Breakthrough Advertising, “They didn’t create demand, they merely channeled it.”

Speaking of channeling demand, let’s look at some of the differences.

When I used to teach marketing management in college, there are two schools of thought in marketing. One is called the pull strategy, and the other the push strategy.

What do they mean? With the push marketing strategy, you are pushing the product through distribution channels. A “channel” can be, for instance:

Manufacturerarrow rightDistributorarrow rightStorearrow rightConsumer

In Internet Marketing and with downloadable products, the channel looks more like this:

Seller/Vendorarrow rightWebsite (eStore/Delivery)arrow rightConsumer

The push strategy is the one most often used by salespeople, infomercials, direct response advertisers, and direct marketers. And, obviously, Internet marketers, too.

The pull strategy, on the other hand, is where reputation and recognition generate awareness and demand. And that demand pulls the product through the distribution channel — thus requiring a lot less legwork, and a lot less need to sell. For example:

Consumerarrow rightStorearrow rightDistributorarrow rightManufacturer

Now, let me put this in a better perspective for you.

Ostensibly, a push strategy can make a lot of money. There’s no denying that. That’s how many marketers make their “millions,” particularly via these massive product launch parades. Problem is, you have to constantly push products to stay afloat.

Sadly, this constant need to push products creates that unflattering “salesman” stigma, where most Internet marketers are largely seen as peddlers and not businesses.

In order to stay alive — or to maintain their standard of living — most Internet marketers need to constantly create new products, make new offers, and seek new “addicts” to push their products onto. (Sounds dangerously close to drug dealers, doesn’t it?)

That’s why most of them churn and burn their lists.

If they stop pushing more products, there is no business.

That’s why Sylvie and I call them “serial drive-by marketers.”

If you use a pull strategy, or complement your existing push strategy with a strong pull strategy, you will work a lot less. The rest will almost take care of itself. The business will keep going, no matter what. And above all, there will be less of that peddler stigma.

What constitutes a strong pull strategy?

Aside from offering in-demand products and solid value, there’s positioning, brand recognition, business identity, good customer service, a loyal fan base, authority in your field, and strong relationships with your customers and prospects. Just to name a few.

(Sure, there are more than that. But how many Internet marketers use any of them? Very little. For example, how many online salesletters have you seen with a logo? ‘Nuff said.)

Think of it this way: there’s a difference between the pawn-shop mentality and the retail store mentality. The former constantly needs products on its shelves to sell to stay alive. But the latter doesn’t need new products to sell. (And by “new” I mean “more.”)

Rather, retail stores need traffic. Consumers. Markets. People with needs. You simply create products to fill needs, not create needs (such as using fake scarcity) so you can shove your products down people’s throats during some big, limited product launch.

In other words, we need to think more like a retail store than like a pawn shop.

Now, I’m not saying we need to become like Wal-Mart or some other big box store. And we don’t need to focus on branding alone, or to advertise via some upscale, big budget, Madison Avenue advertising firm like many big brand stores do. No, not at all.

But we need to think like Wal-Mart.

We need to think like an Internet marketing business instead of like a peddler.

How would you feel if, upon entering your local Wal-Mart, they only had one product available at any given time? Or they had limited quantities of a product you know well and good wasn’t limited? Or they used high-pressure, time-sensitive tactics to sell you?

Sadly, most Internet marketers conduct their business like pawn shops. I’m not saying we should stop using direct response. Direct marketing, particularly for small businesses, is essential. But it should complement a good business strategy. Not replace it.

How great would it be if you sold products like crazy simply because people asked? How great would it be if you never had to sell or use any kind of manufactured scarcity to sell? And how much more money would you make, especially over the long term?

Bottom line, start focusing on creating long-term, solid businesses rather making serialized promotions for subpar products with time-limited, over-the-top product launches that at best merely provide short-term cash injections.

Something to think about.

By the way, if you’re interested in how to become a recognized authority, and position yourself and your business in a way that generates authentic demand and scarcity, then I encourage you to come to next week’s Authority Event in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Other Related Posts

Are Product Launches Peddling For Profits? originally appeared on The Michel Fortin Blog. Please visit to subscribe to it, or Tweet This.


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Facebook Fake Friend Fallout


rude and arrogant friendThe other day, I removed a friend from my personal Facebook profile for reasons that will soon become clear to you.

He was so incensed, he wrote me a personal message accusing me of being rude and insulting. He even remarked that I’m arrogant, and snarkily added that some of his “friends” seem to feel the same way.

Now, before I give you the reason, I’d like to share with you my philosophy on Facebook friendships in general.

To me, and I think it’s simply common sense, a friend is a friend. It’s someone you know, someone you have a relationship with, someone you want to stay connected with, and someone you consider a real friend — not a fan, follower, or worse yet, a spammer.

And the latter of the three is the one I can’t stand.

You see, I have hit my 5,000 friend limit several times on Facebook. After removing a few undesirables from time to time, new ones keep filling it up. So we’ve created a fan page, which has no limit. That way, anyone can join, become a fan, and connect with us.

But there’s a difference between a “profile” and “page.” Between a “friend” and a “fan.” Those differences are not mine. They are Facebook’s. Their policies are pretty clear.

Personal profiles are not to be used for commercial purposes.

I know. It’s not only listed in their terms, but Facebook have also told me personally.

Befriending someone on Facebook can be just as problematic as following someone on Twitter. Just like Twitter said when they dumped auto-follow from their native application:

“It is unlikely that any­one can actu­ally read tweets from thou­sands of accounts which makes this activ­ity disingenuous.”

Even Seth Godin calls mass-friending as “fake networking.” This applies to Facebook as much as it does to Twitter — or to any other social media application, for that matter.

I wanted to keep my friends’ list clean. I could have, like some marketers out there, dumped my profile entirely, or deleted my entire friends’ list, and started from scratch.

But I didn’t want to do that. Starting from scratch can seem just as disingenuous.

So in order to whittle my list down to the people I really do want to stay friends with, including family members, old school friends, and several marketers I have an actual relationship with, I’ve decided to remove friends based on the following five criteria.

If the people are not known to me (i.e., people I don’t really know, have never met, or haven’t some kind of personal relationship with), I remove the following:

  1. People who spam me. Specifically, people who constantly send me fan requests, group join requests, event invites, or friend suggestions — and that is only if I don’t know the person making the suggestion in the first place. I not only ignore their requests but also remove these people as friends the moment I get them.
  2. People who push me with their applications. I block those outright. I click on the application name, then “block application” on the left-hand side of the page. I also block the people who send them because they have a tendency to be app junkies. (No more “Mafia Wars,” “Farmville,” or “Chinese Astrology” notifications.)
  3. People with fake names or business names. I see a lot of friends whose Facebook names are businesses, websites, or brands. Let me remind you that Facebook profiles are not to be used for commercial purposes. Needless to say, I don’t believe “ABC Marketing, Inc.” can be single or married, male or female, a republican or a democrat, or 32 years old and a graduate of a high school in Wichita.
  4. People with fake profile pictures. My opinion is, if you can’t put a real picture of a real person on your personal profile, then what are you hiding? If you have to hide behind some logo, cartoon character, or a shot of some product you sell, to me it means you’re not willing to connect with the people you befriend.
  5. People whose friends are people I wish to distance myself from. In other words, in their friends lists are people I prefer not to be associated with. If any of the above criteria are not met, I then check out who their friends are. If there’s anyone in that list I don’t like, and if I don’t know them personally, they’re gone.

Above all, I’m not on Facebook to provide customer support or free advice, or to do any networking. (Sure, I do network. But it’s not my primary focus.) So I also remove friends who send me a direct message in some obvious attempt to extract free advice from me.

Yes, I’m very selective of who I hang around with. But I don’t spend endless hours scouring my friend list searching for anyone who meets any of the above criteria. I only apply it to friends who happen to spam me and to those who try to add me as a friend.

Incidentally, when adding friends I prefer and particularly approve those who add a small message with their friend request. They’re making an effort in introducing themselves to me, and in sharing some commonality or reason why we should be friends.

Bottom line, I’m very protective of my time, my reputation, and my integrity.

Back to the “friend” who rebuked me for unfriending him. He added me as a friend, and spammed me with a request of some kind literally the next day. Now, spamming me is one thing. But spamming me within hours of adding me as a friend is another.

When people do this, it makes their friend request suspect.

Not only do I de-friend people who do this, but I hesitate even less when the request comes in shortly after adding me as a friend. Facebook is filled with people who add “friends” for the sole purpose of pushing their offers, businesses, or opportunities.

(Sorry, but I’m not interested in your “opportunity.”)

I replied to this fellow and expressed that he should have given me a chance to explain before jumping the gun. His reply was just as perplexing when he counter-accused me of jumping to conclusions by unfriending him so quickly. (Uh, merry-go-round, anyone?)

Dizzying, indeed. When I look at this situation, Seth Godin’s “permission marketing” comes to mind. Specifically, don’t ask me to marry you when we’re still on the first date.

Nevertheless, I don’t have time to vet each friend request, much less every friend on my list. So following this “whittling” process seems to work for me.

It’s the lesser of two evils — removing undesirables one by one is a lot less daunting than deleting all my entire friends list and starting over from scratch. Plus, in the end by cleaning out my friends list allows me to stay in touch with only the people I want.

If not adding everyone who asks as a friend, being selective of who I choose to befriend, and unfriending undesirables makes me arrogant, then I guess I am.

Come to think of it, this argument is very reminiscent of the whole “auto-follow fiasco” on Twitter I wrote about before. As I said on Twitter, I’d rather be seen as a snobby bastard who doesn’t care than as a fake friend who pretends that he does.

Not following you back (or in this case, not befriending you) doesn’t make me rude, arrogant, or discourteous. This is a blatant myth propagated by some social media gurus who are using peer pressure to justify their attempt to grow their own lists.

Ditto with people befriending others for the purpose of getting free advice or support. I do offer support. That’s why I have staff and a helpdesk. And yes, I do try to help whenever I can. But there’s a difference between customer service and customer support.

So if you want to become my friend, I only ask three simple things.

  1. Respect. Respect for my time, my business, my customers, and my current friends. Just as much as I respect yours. It’s not just a mutual courtesy. It’s simple common sense. To add me as a friend, you need to be, well, a friend. Or at least friendly.
  2. Authenticity. Be real, genuine, and sincere. Don’t use a fake name or picture. Sure, I understand if you want to use a picture of a leprechaun on St. Paddy’s Day or a picture of your favorite NFL mascot during the Super Bowl. But not all year round. (Remember, in someone’s profile there’s a folder is called “profile pictures.” I can instantly see if there are any “real pictures” in there.)
  3. And finally, friendship. Be a friend or show a willingness to befriend me — not as a sales lead, a subscriber, or a babysitter, but as a friend. Talk to me. Add a message to your friend request. Or post on my wall something I’m interested in. Or comment on some of my postings. Let’s converse. Engage me, not enrage me.

Ultimately, think of it this way. Would you treat a real friend or someone you wish to become a real friend with the same way you treat a Facebook friend? If so, then Facebook is not the place for you. There are better places for that.

They’re called tradeshows.

The Michel Fortin Blog.

.

Other Related Posts


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Linchpin videos (first in a series)


We’re traveling around, finding interesting people and asking them to riff for a minute or two about what makes someone indispensable. Kicking off the weekly series is Gary Vee. Click the picture to view it. We’ll do four for February and see how it goes.

Linchpin: GaryVee from Seth Godin on Vimeo.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Update on the early Linchpin citizen reviewers


Last month, I offered readers who wanted to review my new book a chance to get an early copy. It was a pretty big risk, because it meant ignoring the tried and true process of talking to big media and tailoring a message for critics and reviewers. What happens when you go to your best customers with a product that's untested?

Five weeks later and I couldn't be more pleased or more grateful. We sent out thousands of books (your donations raised more than $100,000 for charity) and so far, the book has been well received  (if you're still expecting one, please be patient, especially Canadians, it should arrive soon – the postal service works in mysterious ways).

The page collecting the blog posts and tweets is here, and the range and depth that people are contributing is really exciting. Some will appear on the end papers in the next printing of my book. Here are some twitter blurbs along with the people you might want to follow:

scott_allison: Just read a preview of Seth Godin's new career manifesto for the new world, Linchpin. Should be given to all school kids.  AronStevenson: Reading the preview of Seth Godin's upcoming book Linchpin – Seth once again delivers what he's promised! Bigbrightbulb: I wish I could tweet [the] hand-scrawled Venn diagrams, they are such a hoot…  jlottosen: Very inspirational – as always. Works on all job types – what do you want to be the great giver of? lantzhoward Loving Seth Godin's #Linchpin. Navigating a new
trail in 2010. This is a book for everyone… bnlv  Yes yes
yes yes yes!!!!! I'm not available at all until this book has been read. recordstyle  one
of those books that you read from the inside out. More of a "find the
(you) in between the lines" style, flow, and feel. BarbaraShantz: Reviewing Seth Godin's new book, Linchpin. Fantastic Common Sense like we've not heard before. DanBlank: I'm only on the table of contents, but I've
already fallen in love with Seth Godin's new book 'Linchpin' rickysteele: Again, Seth Godin, has written a masterpiece.
His newest book, Linchpin, will be one of this year's most important books.
Life Changing! paul_shinn: Also read all of Linchpin in one sitting. A
great book. Going to think about who I will give the book so they can read it too. mavenroger: Just got my prerelease copy of Godin's Linchpin!
In short, it's about doers not talkers. Psyched…more to com. johnwaire found myself taking some extra time to warm up the car this morning…so i could squeeze in a few pages of linchpin ….
You can find fresh ones here.

In addition, here are three or four blog reviews. The rest are here.

I can't imagine why any author given the chance to do this would hesitate. Bypassing professional critics and allowing real people to use the newly powerful platforms available to them is faster, more direct and gives you far more feedback on your work. Not for the faint of heart though. It's emotionally easier to just push things to retail and hope for the best. Thanks to all who have contributed so far. I'm really humbled by the response.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,